What Musk Cut: The Quiet Catastrophe Inside the U.S. Government

Written by

·

It’s tempting to dismiss the name DOGE—the Department of Government Efficiency—a nod to an old meme coin. But intentionally or not, the name carries a darker historical echo. The word doge comes from the Latin dux, meaning leader or military commander, and was used for centuries to denote the head of state in the Venetian Republic. The Doge of Venice was an elected, but often unaccountable, figure of immense power—both ceremonial and political. That same linguistic root was later seized upon by Benito Mussolini, who styled himself Il Duce, the absolute leader. 

Whether Trump and Musk knowingly connected these dots or not, the symbolism is uncomfortably fitting: beneath the smirking meme lies a title steeped in centralized, unchecked authority.

In recent months, we’ve heard plenty about Elon Musk’s role at the helm of DOGE and the sweeping changes it’s made across U.S. federal agencies. Much of it has been covered with a mix of outrage and bemusement: the meme-like name, the brutal job cuts, the erratic posts on X. But having worked for decades inside a large international institution, I see something deeper, and far more serious.

This isn’t just disruption. It’s systemic dismantling—and the real consequences haven’t even begun to show.

The visible signs are already troubling: agencies scrambling to rehire dismissed nuclear safety staff, bird flu surveillance systems abandoned, key mortgage data lost or corrupted. USAID—the main channel for U.S. foreign development aid—was wiped out without so much as a vote in Congress. Thousands have lost their jobs, but even that number is fuzzy, because DOGE’s own reporting is less trustworthy than the bureaucracy it replaced.

That alone is dangerous: when data disappears, damage becomes unverifiable. And when no one can verify what’s broken, accountability vanishes too. But the real threat lies deeper. This kind of bureaucratic assault does not show up all at once in headlines. It appears slowly, insidiously:

▪️When a natural disaster strikes, and the coordinated response is days too late.

▪️When a housing crisis erupts, and no one has up-to-date data to model the risk.

▪️When international crises escalate, and there’s no USAID presence left to stabilize the region.


These are not hypotheticals. They’re the natural consequences of erasing institutional memory, firing experienced staff en masse, and replacing them with tech loyalists who don’t understand what they’ve inherited—or what they’re destroying.

I’ve seen this before, in smaller forms. Once internal trust collapses, systems don’t function the same. People stop speaking up. The best staff quietly exit. The ambitious young no longer apply. And what remains is fear, silence, and rot.


We don’t yet know how much damage Musk has done. Federal employees who remain are unlikely to speak out—not under this administration. But anyone who has worked in government or large-scale operations knows that what’s happened isn’t reform. It’s institutional sabotage.


Musk didn’t streamline the government. He hollowed it out, then tweeted about it.


And if history teaches us anything, it’s that what was broken in months may take decades to rebuild—if it can be rebuilt at all.

Leave a comment